Upstream Competition and Downstream Buyer Power
نویسندگان
چکیده
It is often claimed that large buyers wield buyer power. Existing theories of this effect generally assume upstream monopoly. Yet the evidence is strongest with upstream competition. We show that upstream competition can yield buyer power for large buyers by generating supplier-level volume uncertainty—a feature that emerges from case study evidence of upstream competition—so the negotiated price depends on the seller’s cost expectation. By analyzing the effect of market structure changes on seller cost expectations the paper gives insights on three key policy-relevant questions around buyer power: (i) who wields it and under what circumstances (ii) does a downstream merger alter the buyer power of other buyers (so-called waterbed effects); and (iii) how are the incentives to invest in upstream technology altered by the creation of large downstream firms?
منابع مشابه
Downstream Competition and the Effects of Buyer Power
To examine the interaction between buyer power and competition intensity in a downstream market, we construct a model in which oligopolistic retailers compete in quantity in the downstream market and one of them is a large retailer that has its own exclusive supplier. We demonstrate that an increase in the buyer power of the large retailer against its supplier leads to a fall in retail price an...
متن کاملDownstream Competition, Foreclosure, and Vertical Integration
This paper analyzes the effect of competition among downstream rms on an upstream rm’s payoff and on its incentive to integrate vertically when rms in both segments negotiate optimal contracts. We argue that as downstream competition becomes more intense, the upstream rm obtains a larger share of a smaller downstream industry prot. The upstream rm may encourage downstream competition (eve...
متن کاملTrust and Reciprocity in 2-node and 3-node Networks
In this paper we focus on the interaction between exogenous network structure and bargaining behavior in a laboratory experiment. Our main question is how competition and cooperation interact in bargaining environments based on networked versions of the investment game. We focus on 3-node networked markets and vary the network structure to model competition upstream— multiple sellers paired wit...
متن کاملHedging Commodity Procurement in a Bilateral Supply Chain
This paper explores the merits of hedging stochastic input costs (i.e., reducing the risk of adverse changes in costs) in a decentralized, risk neutral supply chain. Specifically, we consider a generalized version of the well-known ‘selling-to-the-newsvendor’ model in which both the upstream and the downstream firms face stochastic input costs. The firms’ operations are intertwined – i.e., the ...
متن کاملThe “Visible Hand” in a Production-Chain Market: A Market Equilibrium from Network Analytical Perspective
We analyze general price equilibrium mechanisms of production-chain markets, comparing the producer market model proposed by Harrison White with hypothesized network effects on pricing that emerge from empirical analysis of trade relationships among over 8,000 firms in a large-scale industrial district in Tokyo. Consistent with White’s model, the supplier-prime buyer relationships are strictly ...
متن کامل